Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @jbh010204, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've introduced a mechanism to define exceptions to the existing whitelist logic, ensuring certain paths always require authentication. This enhances security by explicitly marking endpoints that should never bypass authentication. Additionally, I've removed a caching annotation from the NoticeService, which suggests a re-evaluation or simplification of the caching strategy for notice retrieval.
Highlights
- Authentication Whitelist Exceptions: I've implemented a new system within the
Whitelistclass to define specific API paths that, despite potentially being covered by a general whitelist, will always require authentication. This ensures critical endpoints are protected. - Caching Removal: The
@Cacheableannotation has been removed from thegetNoticesmethod inNoticeService, indicating a change in caching strategy for notice retrieval.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces an exception mechanism to the request whitelisting logic, allowing specific sub-paths of a whitelisted path to require authentication. This is a good security enhancement. However, I've identified a significant inconsistency in path matching logic that should be addressed. Additionally, a caching mechanism for notices has been removed, which could impact performance. I've also included a suggestion to improve code readability in the new whitelisting logic.
✨ 구현한 기능
📢 논의하고 싶은 내용
🎸 기타